Monday, December 23, 2024
HomeHeadlineTrump’s attorneys argue "legal nullity"

Trump’s attorneys argue “legal nullity”

Newsman: Former President Donald Trump has submitted his formal answer to the article of impeachment through his attorneys Bruce Castor Jr. and David Schoen on Tuesday afternoon arguing that the trial is unconstitutional as he is out of office, and denying that he violated the oath of office. Trump’s attorneys deny that Trump was “factually in error” when he claimed on Jan. 6 that he had won the election by a landslide.

House Democrats filed their own brief earlier Tuesday, arguing that Trump bears “unmistakable” responsibility for inciting the Jan. 6 riot on the Capitol and calling it a “betrayal of historic proportions” that demands judgment from the Senate. But the core of Trump’s legal argument is that the trial is unconstitutional — a “legal nullity,” his attorneys write — because he is no longer a sitting president.  

Trump’s attorneys made it clear that they are leaving the door open to argue claims of election fraud, and appear ready to defend the president’s words at the Jan. 6 “Save America” rally that preceded the deadly attack on the Capitol, which Trump has been charged with inciting.

“It is admitted that President Trump addressed a crowd at the Capitol ellipse on January 6, 2021 as is his right under the First Amendment to the Constitution and expressed his opinion that the election results were suspect, as is contained in the full recording of the speech,” Trump’s lawyers write.

“To the extent Averment 5 alleges his opinion is factually in error, the 45th President denies this allegation,” the brief said, responding to the portion of the article of impeachment that states: “Shortly before the Joint Session commenced, President Trump, addressed a crowd at the Capitol ellipse in Washington DC. There, he reiterated false claims that ‘we won this election, and we won it by a landslide.'”

Trump’s lawyers say the “recording accurately reflects the content of the conversation,” but that the comments aren’t inappropriate in any way.

“It is denied that the word ‘find’ was inappropriate in context, as President Trump was expressing his opinion that if the evidence was carefully examined one would ‘find that you have many that aren’t even signed and you have many that are forgeries,’ the lawyers argue.

“It is denied that President Trump threatened Secretary Raffensperger. It is denied that President Trump acted improperly in that telephone call in any way,” they said.

The article of impeachment also cited Trump’s call with Georgia Republican secretary of state Brad Raffensberger in which Trump urged him to “find” enough votes for him to win the state.

“The people of Georgia are angry. The people of the country are angry, and there’s nothing wrong with saying that, you know, that you’ve recalculated,” Trump said on the hour-long call. “All I want to do is this: I just want to find 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have … Fellas, I need 11,000 votes, give me a break.”

NEWSMAN
NEWSMAN
This mission is rooted in our belief that great journalism has the power to enrich the experience of life that not only fulfills the purpose of life but also helps every single individual in society with the spirit of human values.

Most Popular